Audio version: Download MP3 or use controls below:
|
![]() Tracks were found in the snow near where the train had been when the murder took place, and even some blood. But that trail went cold when authorities found the tracks came from and returned to a local farm; the farmer said he’d suffered a nosebleed from the cold. Clearly whoever did the killing remained on the train. There was that dining-car waiter. But he was quickly eliminated as a suspect. He had been asleep in a berth at the other end of the train, and had several solid witnesses to back up his alibi. Then there was Pvt. Wilson, of course, found standing over the body with blood all over his hands. But Wilson was a U.S. Marine, and one rather expects Marines to run to the rescue of women who cry out in the night. Nobody wanted him to turn out to be the guy who did it; it would be like learning that a firefighter was a secret serial killer. How would that look to the citizens of a country at war, its trains and subways packed with young men in uniform? How would home-front logistics be affected if women started looking at every young man in uniform as a potential predator? How would it reflect on the military; how would it affect home-front morale? So the authorities were quite relieved when a third suspect was found: a cook by the name of Robert E. Lee Folkes.
THE OFFICIAL STORY was that Folkes was fingered after Pvt. Wilson recalled seeing him in the kitchen as he raced through in pursuit of the brown-suited man, and noticed he was sweaty-looking. So the Los Angeles Police Department had brought him in for questioning. Folkes, the LAPD claimed, had maintained his innocence until confronted with assurance that two women who said he’d made aggressive passes at them earlier in the evening had positively identified him from his mugshot, at which dread news he “broke down” and confessed it all. Wilson, who freely and frankly acknowledged how bad things looked for him, greeted the news that Folkes had confessed with an obvious sigh of relief. “Boy, am I glad to hear that,” he said. He wasn’t the only one. Folkes was everything the authorities could have wanted in a suspect, and then some: sophisticated and urban in that jazzy Harlem-Renaissance way, he appeared in court sporting a bright-blue “zoot suit.” Even better, he was Black — which in 1940s America made stories of his alleged wickedness a whole lot easier to sell than would have been the case had he been white. Those stories sold very well indeed at Folkes’ murder trial, a sensational proceeding held in Albany at the Linn County Courthouse and juried by eight women and four men. After 17 hours’ deliberation, they found him guilty and sent him off to the gas chamber; two years later, his appeals exhausted and the governor refusing to intervene, this was done. But questions still lingered in the air. The only real evidence against Folkes had been his confession — obtained by the LAPD in an interrogation. Had that confession been faked or coerced? Was Folkes guilty only of being handy when someone needed a scapegoat? The short answer is, almost certainly, yes. But the longer, more detailed answer is coming with Part Two of this three-part series on the murder that the newspapers were calling “The War Bride Murder.”
|
On our Sortable Master Directory you can search by keywords, locations, or historical timeframes. Hover your mouse over the headlines to read the first few paragraphs (or a summary of the story) in a pop-up box.
©2008-2016 by Finn J.D. John. Copyright assertion does not apply to assets that are in the public domain or are used by permission.